Unequal Power Relationships in Medical Discourse: Exploring the Use of Inclusive and Exclusive Pronouns in Medical Consultations in Lahore, Pakistan

Authors

  • Dr. Ayesha Junaid FCCU, Lahore

Keywords:

Inclusive pronoun, exclusive pronoun, patient-centeredness, paternalistic approach, power relations

Abstract

The current rhetoric of medical consultations supports egalitarian and patient-centered interactions. However it is unclear, to what extent doctor-patient interactions practically represent partnership in Pakistan. The study identifies patient-centeredness through the deployment of inclusive and exclusive pronominals in medical consultations. The data were collected through 15 video-recorded medical consultations in healthcare sectors of Lahore in 2022. The occurrences of inclusive and exclusive pronouns were manually calculated from the transcribed data set. Four types of pronouns have been identified from doctors’ speech from the data set: 1) exclusive pronouns such as aap (you), and is (him/her); 2) exclusive pronoun ma (I) and hum; 3) inclusive pronouns such as hum (we); and 4) use of null pronoun. Patients were mostly submissive listeners. The findings suggested a prototypical pattern in doctor and patient interactions that identifies with doctors’ paternalistic approach of consultations with patients, despite the current paradigm that supports partnership between doctors and patients.

References

Aper, L., Veldhuijzen, W., Dornan, T., van de Ridder, M., Koole, S., Derese, A., &Reniers, J. (2015). Should I prioritize medical problem solving or attentive listening?”: The dilemmas and challenges that medical-students experience when learning to conduct consultations. Patient education and counseling, 98(1), 77-84.

Azim, M. U., Hussain, Z., Bhatti, A. M., & Iqbal, M. (2020). ‘Observable Signals’ of Motivation in Teaching-Learning Process. Journal of Communication and Cultural Trends, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.32350/jcct/2020/21/849

Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this" We"? Levels of collective identity and self- representations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 71(1), 83.

Casanova, V. (2016). Peter Garrett 2010: Attitudes to Language (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lingua Americana, 20(38), 134-141.

Chrusciel, J., Clément, M. C., Steunou, S., Prost, T., Duclos, A., & Sanchez, S. (2023). Effect of the Implementation of the French Hospital Regionalization Policy on Patient Mobility. Health Systems & Reform, 9(1), 2267256.

Cubic, B. (2020). Consultation in medical settings.

Du Bois, Inke. (2012). Grammatical, pragmatic and sociolinguistic aspects of the first-person plural pronoun. In Subjectivity in Language and in Discourse, ed. N. Baumgarten, I. Du Bois,and J. House, 319–338.Bingley, UK: Emerald.

De Cock, Barbara. (2011). Why we can be you: The use of 1st person plural forms with hearer reference in English and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics43(11): 2762–2775.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.009

De Cock, B., & Kluge, B. (2016). On the referential ambiguity of personal pronouns and its pragmatic consequences. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 26(3), 351-360.Defibaugh, S. (2014). Solidarity and alignment in nurse practitioner–patient interactions. Discourse & Communication, 8(3), 260-277.

Flick, U. (2018). Doing qualitative data collection–charting the routes. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection, 1-16.

Gabbott, M., & Hogg, G. (2001). The role of non-verbal communication in service encounters: A conceptual framework. Journal of Marketing Management, 17(1-2), 5-26.

Godard, D. (2012). Indicative and subjunctive mood in complement clauses: from formal semantics to grammar writing. Empirical issues in syntax and semantics, 9, 129-148.

Harris, M. (2016). Commentary Responses to “What Is Your Professional Name and Title?”. Home Healthcare Now, 34(10), 580-582.

Hassan, S. (2020). Populism and popularity in Imran Khan’s 2018 election speeches. Politics and Populism across Modes and Media. Edited by Ruth Breeze and Ana María Fernández Vallejo. Bern: Peter Lang AG, Available online: https://www. Research gate. net/publication/339336980 (accessed on 24 April 2021).

Helmbrecht, J. (2015). A typology of non-prototypical uses of personal pronouns: Synchrony and diachrony. Journal of pragmatics, 88, 176-189.

Junaid, A., & Rafi, M. S. (2019). Communication barriers between doctors, nurses and patients in medical consultations at hospitals of Lahore Pakistan. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 69(3), 560-65.

Junaid, A., Rafi, M. S., Khan, N. U. S., & Khan, J. S. (2020). POWER SHARING IN MEDICAL CONSULTATIONS. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 70(6), 1756-64.

Kidwai, S. (2022). A Survey of Urdu Subjects and their Properties.

Liu, C., Calvo, R. A., & Lim, R. (2016). Improving medical students’ awareness of their non-verbal communication through automated non-verbal behavior feedback. Frontiers in ICT, 3, 11.

Moumjid, N., Carretier, J., Marsico, G., Blot, F., Durif-Bruckert, C., & Chauvin, F. (2017). Moving towards shared decision making in the physician-patient encounter in France: state of the art and future prospects. ZeitschriftfürEvidenz, Fortbildung und QualitätimGesundheitswesen, 123, 41-45.

Moumjid, N., Durand, M. A., Carretier, J., Charuel, E., Daumer, J., Haesebaert, J., ... & Blot, F. (2022). Implementation of shared decision-making and patient-centered care in France: Towards a wider uptake in 2022. ZeitschriftfürEvidenz, Fortbildung und QualitätimGesundheitswesen, 171, 42-48.

Nunberg, G. (2004). Descriptive indexicals and indexical descriptions. na.

Schimpff, A. (2019). ‘We’but Not ‘Me’: A Sociolinguistic Study of the Speaker-exclusive First-Person Plural Pronoun ‘We’“. Lifespans & Styles, 5(1), 1-15.

Steffens, N. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2013). Power through ‘us’: Leaders’ use of we-referencing language predicts election victory. PloS one, 8(10), e77952.

Skelton, John R., Andy M. Wearn, and F. D.Richard Hobbs. 2002. ‘I’and ‘we’: A concordancing analysis of how doctors and patients use first person pronouns in primary care consultations. Family Practice19(5): 484–488.https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/19.5.484

Skerry-Ryan, R. J., Battenberg, E., Xiao, Y., Wang, Y., Stanton, D., Shor, J., ... &Saurous, R. A. (2018, July). Towards end-to-end prosody transfer for expressive speech synthesis with tacotron. In international conference on machine learning (pp. 4693-4702). PMLR.

Thomas, M., Hariharan, M., Rana, S., Swain, S., & Andrew, A. (2014). Medical jargons as hindrance in doctor–patient communication. Psychological Studies, 59, 394-400.

Zand, S., Baradaran, M., Najafi, R., Maleki, A., & GolbaziMahdipour, A. (2020). Culture and Gender in nonverbal communication. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal (RRJ), 8(12), 123-130.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Junaid, D. A. (2023). Unequal Power Relationships in Medical Discourse: Exploring the Use of Inclusive and Exclusive Pronouns in Medical Consultations in Lahore, Pakistan. Critical Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 56–68. Retrieved from https://journals.gctownship.edu.pk/index.php/crssh/article/view/94

Issue

Section

Articles