A Move Analysis of the Methodology Sections of Pakistani Researchers’ Articles in the Field of English Linguistics and Literature
Keywords:
Move Analysis, Research articles, methodology section, pakistani researchers, Peacock's modelAbstract
This research article delves into the methodological sections of research articles (RAs) in the fields of English Linguistics and Literature authored by Pakistani researchers. It addresses the paucity of attention given to this critical section of RAs and aims to identify its move structure and the average length. The research design involves a qualitative analysis of ten RAs from high-impact journals published between 2009 and 2021. The study employs Peacock's move-based model and assesses the frequency of specific moves within the methodology sections, revealing that Subjects, Procedure, Data Analysis, and Location are prominent moves. The study also reveals a lack of standardization and shorter methodology sections in Pakistani RAs. These findings emphasise the need for greater emphasis on methodology writing, both in academia and pedagogy, to enhance research quality and reporting clarity in the Pakistani context. This research is anticipated to provide a valuable resource for scholars and educators looking to improve RA writing practices in Pakistan's research community.
Key words: Move analysis, research articles, methodology section, Pakistani researchers, Peacock’s model
References
Alamri, Basim M. (2017). Connecting Genre-Based and Corpus-Driven Approaches in Research Articles: A Comparative Study of Moves and Lexical Bundles in Saudi and International Journals. UNM Digital Repository: PhD diss., University of New Mexico. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/educ_llss_etds/81
Amnuai, W., & Wannaruk, A. (2013). A move-based analysis of the conclusion sections of research articles published in international and Thai journals. 3L; Language, Linguistics and Literature, The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 19(2), 53–63.
Aslam, I., & Mehmood, A. (2014). Genre analysis of conclusion sections of Pakistani research articles in natural and social sciences. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 4(22), 106-113.
Biber et al. (2007). Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 290 ISBN 978- 90272-2302-9.
Brett, P. (1994). A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles, English for Specific Purposes, 13(1), 47–59.
Cook, G. (1990). Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Connor, U.M., & Mauranen, A. (1999). Linguistic Analysis of Grant Proposals: European Union Research Grants. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 47-62.
Cotos, E. et al. (2015). Furthering and applying move/step constructs: Technology-driven marshalling of Swalesian genre theory for EAP pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 52-72.
Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Genre analysis: An approach to text analysis for ESP. In M. Coultard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 218–228) London: Routledge.
Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 321-337.
Holmes, R. (2001). Variation and text structure: The discussion section in economics research articles. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 107-135.
Huang, D. (2014). Genre analysis of moves in medical research articles. Stylus, 5(1),7-17.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269–292.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2012). Research Article Structure of Research Article Introductions in Three Engineering Subdisciplines. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 55(4), 294–309. doi:10.1109/tpc.2012.2223252
Khamkhien, T. (2015). Textual Organisation and Linguistic Features in Applied Linguistics Research Articles: Moving from Introduction to Methods. Ijasos- International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences. 1(2), 111-122.
Lim, J. M. H. (2006). Method sections of management research articles: A pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 282–309.
McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morales, R.C. (2016). Discourse features of methodology sections of research articles in high-impact and non-high-impact, Applied Linguistics journals. Asian Journal of English Language Studies (8).
Nwogu, K. N. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119-138.
Paltridge, B. (1994). Genre analysis and the identification of textual boundaries. Applied Linguistics, 15, 288-299.
Peacock, M. (2011). The Structure of the Method Section in Research Articles Across Eight Disciplines. The Asian ESP Journal, 7(2), 99-124.
Rasmeenin, C. (2006). A structural move analysis of MA thesis discussion sections in applied linguistics. Unpublished MA thesis, Mahidol University.
Rashid, A., Mahmood, M. A., & Ahmad, S. (2017). Linguistic variation across research sections: A multidimensional analysis of Pakistani academic journal articles. Global Language Review, 2(1), 15-37.
Salmani Nodoushan, M. A., & Khakbaz, N. (2011). Theses ‘Discussion’ sections: A structural move analysis. International Journal of Language Studies, 5(3), pp. 111-132.
Shehzad, W. & Abbas, A. (2016). Genre Analysis of Generic Section Headings of MPhil Theses’ Introduction Section of Linguistics and Literature. NUML Journal of Critical inquiry. 14(1), 67-86.
Sinclair, J. (2005). Corpus and Text - Basic Principles. In M. Wynne (Ed.), Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice. (pp. 1-16.) Oxford: Oxbow Books.
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J., & Feak, C. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Michigan series in English for academic and professional purposes (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Thomas, S., & Hawes, T. P. (1994). Reporting verbs in medical journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 2, 134-155.
Vassileva, I. (1997). Hedging in English and Bulgarian academic writing. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse Berlin (pp. 203-221). Mouton de Gruyter.
Wood, A. (2001). International scientific English: The language of research scientists around the world. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes, Cambridge applied linguistics series (1. publ.), (71-83) Cambridge Univ. Press.